Politics Health Country 2026-03-26T12:38:44+00:00

The Philosophy of a Good Life in the Age of Acceleration

British anthropologist Tim Ingold and German sociologist Hartmut Rosa offer a joint reflection on how to build a good life in the modern world, where social acceleration and the loss of connections threaten human existence. Their works serve as a compass for diagnosing problems and finding alternative paths for development.


The Philosophy of a Good Life in the Age of Acceleration

Tim Ingold, a British anthropologist known for his approach of 'philosophizing with the people,' reminds us that a good life is built in the fabric of relationships—with people, with objects, with the ecosystem—and that attention and care are material conditions. He argues that people are not isolated entities, but knots in networks of relationships with other beings and the environment; he proposes to understand human life as a practice and continuous attention to the world. Hartmut Rosa, a German sociologist, has developed the theory of social acceleration. In turn, Rosa warns us that the rhythm imposed by modernity—such as intensified work, immediate consumption, and expectations of optimization—fades human relationships and prevents resonance, understood as that feeling of correspondence with the world. For Rosa, modernity is characterized by processes that accelerate social time and erode the meaningful bonds between individuals, institutions, and the surrounding world. Critical philosophy here has a double task: to diagnose and to propose itself as a transformative practice. To diagnose, because it is necessary to point out how economic, technological, and cultural structures predispose us to alienation and loss of meaning; to propose, because complaining is not enough: it is necessary to imagine and experiment with alternatives that foster different rhythms of life, spaces of resonance, and forms of social organization that promote reciprocity. Reading Ingold and Rosa together forces us to confront compatible perspectives. The first one challenges our ways of life by asking about the modes of inhabiting the world; the second one diagnoses how social acceleration and loss of resonance configure the late modern experience. Reading Ingold and Rosa together reminds us that a good life is not a commodity or an achievement measurable exclusively by productivity or material well-being. The two questions—'How should we live?' and 'What is a good life?'—are intertwined and together form a compass to think about both questions posed by these authors in societies that push us towards acceleration and disconnection. The author is a doctor in philosophy. Keeping both questions alive and turning them into a guide for action for ourselves and future generations.